Research Summary

We are interested in chemistry in complex environments where, for example, collective properties of the system feedback onto the molecular scale chemical events. Such multi-scale coupling is widespread in biological systems, from dynamical movements within a protein to morphological transitions of whole cells. We pursue a variety of research projects emphasizing physical mechanisms of molecular self-organization and the role of spatial patterning as a regulator of differential outcomes from otherwise chemically equivalent systems. These range from fundamental studies of self-organizing structures in lipid membranes to the controlled spatial manipulation of biochemical signal transduction networks in living cells. A unifying theme among my research projects is the importance of large-scale collective interactions on the behavior of the system. To experimentally address these problems, we have developed a research group with expertise in a cross-disciplinary collection of techniques including state-of-the-art hard and soft nano-lithography, sophisticated surface imaging strategies, and ex vivo cell membrane assembly. An important experimental platform for this work consists of biologically-inspired interfaces created by self-assembling lipid membrane and protein structures on inorganic materials. These systems range from membrane-derivatized colloidal particles, to curvature patterned substrates and hybrid live cell – supported membrane junctions.



   Overview

Thousands of membrane associated receptors and signaling molecules transduce signals between cells. In many cases, properties of individual binding events have proven insufficient to account for the remarkable behavior exhibited by these proteins in the cellular context. Collective protein-protein interactions and clustering on molecular length scales have been widely implicated in signal transduction. More recently, coordinated rearrangement of cell membrane receptors into distinctive patterns is emerging as a broadly significant theme of intercellular signaling. Hallmark examples are provided by the immunological synapses, which over the last few years have been discovered at junctions between a variety of immune cells and their respective target cells during antigen recognition. Spatial patterns of proteins within the junction develop as populations of receptors on one cell membrane engage their cognate ligands on the apposed cell membrane. The emergent patterns can be microns in extent, thus transcending direct protein-protein contact interactions, and exhibit strong correlations with the ensuing intracellular signaling and effector functions.

Our research program is broadly inspired by signaling through the T cell receptor (TCR) in the context of the immunological synapse. This system embodies a great wealth of physical phenomenon, ranging from pattern self-assembly to regulation of stochastic noise. At the same time, it is experimentally approachable with physical methods due, in part, to the vast quantity of knowledge and reagents that have emerged as the result of its intensive study in the context of cellular immunology. The questions we pose, however, are not specific to T cells. We are seeking physical paradigms, which may be recurrent in a wide range of living cellular systems. Correspondingly, experimental efforts in our group run the gamut from precision measurements in highly abstracted model membranes to full live cell signaling studies. They share the overarching goal of developing a quantitative physical picture of chemical signaling networks in living cells.



   Hybrid live cell – supported membrane junctions

We have developed a hybrid live cell – supported membrane system that enables the use of solid-state nanostructures on the substrate to guide the formation of synapses with alternative patterns. Thus through physical perturbations, a rich array of alternatively patterned synapses can be induced in living cells (Figure 1). These repatterned synapses can be thought of as spatial mutations of the signaling apparatus in otherwise chemically equivalent cells. Analysis of the alternatively patterned synapses reveals a causal relationship between the radial position of T cell receptors and signaling activity. These results support a model of the synapse in which spatial translocation of TCR represents a direct mechanism of signal regulation. This work, which is a collaborative effort with Prof. Michael Dustin of NYU, was published in Science 2005; all experiments and analyses were performed by my student (Kaspar Mossman).

The hybrid live cell – supported membrane configuration is also ideally suited to single molecule and cluster tracking experiments. Using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy, TCR transport during synapse formation and the redirection of TCR movements by substrate barriers can be tracked. Such studies are being employed in my laboratory to dissect out the various transport and organization mechanisms that lead to synapse formation and the assembly of signaling complexes.

Another emerging branch of the T cell synapse repatterning efforts in my laboratory involves use of a photo-activated peptide to enable optically-controlled exposure of antigen to T cells. NVOC (6-Nitroveratryloxycarbonyl) is a photo-cleavable amino-protecting group that is cleaved by 340-360nm UV light. Selectively attaching NVOC to the side-chain amine of a critical lysine residue (K99) on the antigenic peptide MCC88-103 introduces a steric hindrance to TCR binding, and blocks recognition by T cells. This reagent will provide new access into both spatial and temporal aspects of amplification and regulation TCR signaling. (37. DeMond and Groves, manuscript appended)

In addition to the T cell effort, we have two other project areas involving hybrid live cell – inorganic interfaces. These include neuronal junctions with synthetic postsynaptic cell surfaces as well as a newer project area focusing on metastasis in breast cancer. In collaboration with Prof. Ehud Isacoff, in the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology here at Berkeley, we have published two papers on neuronal cell system: Nature Chem. Biol. 2005 and Langmuir 2005. The metastasis project is an emergent effort in collaboration with Prof. Joe Gray, of the Bioscience Division at LBNL. One basic publication is out (ChemBioChem 2006), but this is primarily a new growth area for my research. The fundamental goal is to develop single cell based diagnostic assays that probe the phenotypic behavior of cells as they crawl through a patterned molecular maze on the surface. Since metastasis results from the misregulation of multiple signals, it is anticipated that multiple signaling molecules (e.g. Ephrin-EphA2 and adhesion molecules) must be co-patterned to recapitulate in vivo – like behaviors. Such assays could be a great utility in context of personalized cancer treatments.


• Manuscript: “Spatial and temporal control of antigen presentation with a photoreleasable agonist peptide”, Andrew L. DeMond and Jay T. Groves.

• Manuscript: “Micropatterned supported membranes as tools for quantitative studies of the immunological synapse”, Kaspar Mossman and Jay T. Groves.

• ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 436-440: "A Fluid Membrane-Based Soluble Ligand Display System for Live Cell Assays", Jwa-Min Nam, Pradeep M. Nair, Richard M. Neve, Joe W. Gray, and Jay T. Groves.

• Science 2005, 310, 1191-1193: “Altered TCR signaling from geometrically repatterned immunological synapses”, Kaspar D. Mossman, Gabriele Campi, Jay T. Groves and Michael L. Dustin.

• Nature Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 283-289: “Neuronal synapse interaction reconstituted between live cells and supported lipid bilayers”, Sophie Pautot, Hanson Lee, Ehud Y. Isacoff, and Jay T. Groves.

• Langmuir 2005, 21, 10693-10698: “Neuronal activation by GPI-linked neuroligin-1 displayed in synthetic lipid bilayer membranes”, Michael M. Baksh, Camin Dean, Sophie Pautot, Shannon DeMaria, Ehud Isacoff, and Jay T. Groves.

• Science’s STKE 2005, 301, pe45: “Learning the chemical language of cell surface interactions”, Jay T. Groves.

• Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3524-3538: “Molecular organization and signal transduction at intermembrane junctions” Jay T. Groves.

• J. Immunol. Meth. 2003, 278, 19-32: “Supported planar bilayers in studies on immune cell adhesion and communication”, Jay T. Groves and Michael L. Dustin.




   Model membrane systems, imaging, and spectroscopy

Several studies of the intercellular synapses between immune cells suggest that mechanical bending of the membrane can drive protein sorting and influence signal transduction events. Such bending effects can manifest at the molecular level, in which intermembrane protein complexes of differing sizes become mutually repulsive as a result of the mechanical deformations of the membrane they induce (e.g. Qi, Groves, and Chakraborty, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 6548; Weikl, Groves, Lipowsky, Europhys. Lett. 2002, 59, 916). Membrane bending can also mediate force transmission between membrane domains over distances of microns. Intrigued by the prospects of fluid cell membranes behaving as mechanical force transducers in cells, my group has developed an array of model membrane systems and complimentary imaging techniques to explore these phenomena.

The ability to image membrane topographical features is critical to understanding reaction mechanisms and organizational principles in cell membranes. We have introduced two strategies for imaging nanometer – scale topographical features in reconstituted membrane junctions. The first is based on intermembrane Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) (J. Am Chem. Soc. 2001; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002). Our quantitative studies of glycolipids and proteins with well-known structures have demonstrated that intermembrane FRET can resolve membrane spacing with Angstrom precesion. The second topographical imaging strategy is based on optical standing wave interferometry. This enables real-time mapping of the membrane surface with nanometer precision and provides resolution extending hundreds of nanometers from the surface. Using this system, we directly resolve thermal fluctuations and intrinsic topography of the membrane surface (J. Phys. Chem. B 2004; Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2004; Biophys. J. 2004). These observations provide insights into the characteristics of the membrane environment and offer new methods for studies of protein interactions within the membrane. Significantly, we have observed in cell free model systems spontaneous pattern formation driven by some the same mechanical forces suspected to be at play in living T cells (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004; Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005; J. Phys Chem. B 2006) (Figure 2).

Membrane topography imaging by fluorescence interference has also proven useful for dynamical observations of membrane bending fluctuations. Using this technique to perform spatiotemporal thermal fluctuation spectroscopy, we observe strong hydrodynamic damping of the fluctuation time-scale (~10,000-fold) when the membranes are near an interface (Figure 3). Quantitative comparison between these measurements and a theoretical description of confined hydrodynamic effects has provided experimental confirmation of the model (Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006). Such hydrodynamic damping effects are likely to exist in junctions between living cells, where they may dominate the binding kinetics of membrane receptor proteins.

The prospect of membrane bending as a mechanism of long range force transduction could be very important in living cells (see, for example, the appended review manuscript: Parthsarathy and Groves). Based on the observation that phase separated membranes in the form of giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) are not spherical, we sought to develop more refined systems that would enable quantification of curvature effects in phase separated bilayer membranes. At one level, allowing a GUV to adhere to a substrate provided enough stabilization for highly ordered superstructures, such as stripes and hexagonal domain arrays, to form. The long range forces leading to the superstructure are curvature mediated (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 36). Further clarification of curvature mediated forces between domains was provided by our introduction of curvature modulated substrates as a means of imposing a precisely defined curvature gradient to the membrane. Using this system, the bending rigidity difference between two coexisting liquid phases could be measured (Langmuir 2006). This allows rough estimation of the strength of curvature coupling in cell membranes and suggests that membrane bending (e.g. by forces applied from the cytoskeleton) would be an effective way of directly moving domains of clustered proteins around the membrane surface.

We have also used measurements of molecular diffusion in membranes, by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and fluorescence cross correlation spectroscopy (FCS), to probe membrane structures. In this branch of work, emphasis has been directed on impact of protein binding to membrane surfaces on the lipid bilayer structure. Anomalously large changes in lipid diffusion have been detected near phase transitions. This allows diffusion measurements to be utilized as a readout of surface binding for analytical purposes (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2826). We have also combined high precision mobility measurements, by FCS, with attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to simultaneously monitor membrane phase and mobility (Forstner, Lee, Parikh, and Groves manuscript appended).


• Manuscript: “Curvature and spatial organization in biological membranes”, Raghuveer Parthasarathy and Jay T. Groves.

• Manuscript: “Lipid lateral mobility and membrane phase structure modulation by protein binding”, Martin B. Forstner, Chanel K. Lee, Atul N. Parikh, and Jay T. Groves.

•Langmuir 2006, 22, 5095-5099: "Curvature-modulated phase separation in lipid bilayer membranes", Raghuveer Parthasarathy, Cheng-han Yu, and Jay T. Groves.

• J. Phys. Chem B 2006, 110, 8513-8516: “Coupled membrane fluctuations and protein mobility in supported inter-membrane junctions”, Raghuveer Parthasarathy and Jay T. Groves.

• Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 118101: “Hydrodynamic damping of membrane thermal fluctuations near surfaces imaged by fluorescence interference microscopy”, Yoshihisa Kaizuka and Jay T. Groves.

• Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 048101: “Electrostatically driven spatial patterns in lipid membrane composition”, Raghuveer Parthasarathy and Jay T. Groves.

• J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2826-2827: “Lipid mobility and molecular binding in fluid lipid membranes”, Victoria Yamazaki, Oksana Sirenko, Robert J. Schafer, and Jay T. Groves.

• J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 36-37: “Formation and spatio-temporal evolution of periodic structures in lipid bilayers”, Sharon Rozovsky, Yoshihisa Kaizuka, and Jay T. Groves.

• Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 12798-12803 (cover): “Protein patterns at lipid bilayer junctions”, Raghuveer Parthasarathy and Jay T. Groves.

• Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 41, 391-414: “Optical techniques for imaging membrane topography”, Raghuveer Parthasarathy and Jay T. Groves.

• Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 905-912: “Structure and dynamics of supported intermembrane junctions” Yoshihisa Kaizuka and Jay T. Groves.

• J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 649-657: “Non-equilibrium adhesion patterns at lipid bilayer junctions” Raghuveer Parthasarathy, Bryan L. Jackson, Thomas J. Lowery, Amy P. Wong, and Jay T. Groves.

• Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 14147-14152: “Molecular topography imaging by intermembrane fluorescence resonance energy transfer”, Amy P. Wong and Jay T. Groves.

• J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12414-12415: “Topographical imaging of an intermembrane junction be combined fluorescence interference and energy transfer microscopies”, Amy P. Wong and Jay T. Groves.




   Bioanalytical and colloid science

An integral component of my research program is continued development of new experimental technologies to manipulate and study biological systems. One important development over the past few years has involved our use of lipid membrane – derivatized colloidal particles. A powerful aspect of this system is that the collective behavior of the colloid, which is governed by particle – particle interactions, provides a cooperative probe of the membrane surface. By putting membranes on the surfaces of colloidal particles, the colloidal behavior of the system can be used to study membranes.

Colloidal phase transitions of membrane – derivatized particles can be used to detect molecular binding events on the membrane surface (Figure 4). This is a sensitive analytical technique that is capable of detecting protein binding at 10-4 monolayer coverage without the need for labels (Nature 2004; Anal. Chem. 2006). A company has licensed our patent on this technology from UC/LBNL and it is now being developed for industrial applications.

Beyond its applicability as an analytical tool, the membrane – derivatized colloid system is revealing interesting new scientific observations. For example, particles of like charge attract over long distances (in monovalent salt) in the condensed phase. While reports of such long range like charge attraction have been around for some time, along with various explanations for the apparent effect, we have been able to use the membrane coating to explore a wide range of surface charge densities. These studies have revealed a striking finding: long range like charge attraction is only observed between negatively charged particles, which are electrostatically levitated above negative substrates. In the symmetrically opposite case of equivalently charged positive particles above positive substrates, we observe exclusive repulsion. The differential effect is drastic. This new observation may help narrow down the range of possible explanations for long range like charge attraction, which is in violation of the Poisson Boltzmann view of electrostatics. This problem is under intensive study in my laboratory at the present time.

In another emergent application, we have imaged surface electrostatic charge patterns by compiling the three dimensional positions of a population of passively diffusing colloidal probe particles. The sedimented particles adopt an equilibrium height distribution above the substrate based on a balance between gravitational and local electrostatic forces. Using dual wavelength reflection interference contrast microscopy, particle heights can be measured with ~1nm precision, based on the phase of the interferogram, while lateral positions can be determined to ~10 nm. Hundreds of particles can be tracked simultaneously as they passively sample the substrate (Langmuir 2005). In the present implementation, surface charge densities are measured to an accuracy of 200 e/nm2 over an absolute range of 500 - 2000 e/nm2, with a spatial resolution of 2 um. Although the readout is entirely optical, the resolution of this imaging technique is not diffraction limited. We have performed general analysis of imaging resolution limits, which predicts spatial resolution to 100 nm is feasible (Clack and Groves, manuscript).


• Manuscript: “Surface electrostatic imaging with passively scanning colloidal probes”, Nathan Clack and Jay T. Groves.

• Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 174-180: "Surface binding affinity measurements from order transitions of lipid membrane – coated colloidal particles", Esther Winter, and Jay T. Groves.

• Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 6985-6988: “A colorimetric bio-barcode amplification assay for cytokines”, Jwa-Min Nam, Amber R. Wise, and Jay T. Groves.

• Langmuir. 2005, 21, 6430-6435: “Many particle tracking with nanometer resolution in three dimensions by reflection interference contrast microscopy”, Nathan Clack and Jay T. Groves.

• Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 1477-1480: “Direct patterning of membrane-derivatized colloids using in situ UV-ozone photolithography”, Cheng-han Yu, Atul N. Parikh, and Jay T. Groves.

• Nature. 2004, 427, 139-141: “Detection of molecular interactions at membrane surfaces through colloid phase transitions”, Michael M. Baksh, Michal Jaros, and Jay T. Groves.






  Other Fun Stuff

Group Meeting Schedule
Major Support
Links





  Hit us up...

Principal Investigator
408A Stanley Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720

Main Laboratory
424 Stanley Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
Phone: (510) 666-3604
Phone: (510) 666-3606
Fax:   (510) 643-3790